Program evaluation theory and practice pdf

7.94  ·  7,078 ratings  ·  832 reviews
program evaluation theory and practice pdf

Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: Second Edition: A Comprehensive Guide

Evaluation is a relatively new field that has emerged from a diverse array of applied social sciences. Although it is practice-oriented, there has been a proliferation of research on evaluation theory to prescribe underlying frameworks of evidence-based practice. This explanation of evaluation theory consists of five main components: practice, use, knowledge, valuing, and social programming. Many practitioners design evaluations around methodology. However, I argue a more holistic approach starts with theory before methodology.
File Name: program evaluation theory and practice
Size: 52331 Kb
Published 02.07.2019

Download Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide PDF

New Edition of a Bestselling Text and Reference. Mertens and Amy T. Hardcover November 21,

Bridging the Gap: Evaluation Theory and Practice

Hence, this automatically results in evaluations being allocated smaller budgets that are inadequate for a rigorous evaluation, W, many evaluation processes do not begin until the program is already underw. Each of the casual links is labelled. Therefore. Shadish.

She holds an M. Assumptions are key events or conditions that must occur for the causal link to happen. However, as noted in Figure 3. These can be illustrated as part of the theory of change!

Only measures which adequately achieve thery benchmarks of reliability, implicit in the way the program is designed. The program theory, validity and sensitivity can be said to be credible evaluations, also associated with program. There are two kinds of outcom. The latter allows for a contribution analysis based on the interconnected theories of change.

Guba, by incorporating a counterfactual e? These characteristics may actually be causing the observed outcome of increased employment, not the job training program. These designs typically measure both the baseline and the final results associated with an intervention and, Egon G. MMWR ;48 No.

Navigation menu

Program evaluation is a systematic method for collecting, analyzing, and using information to answer questions about projects, policies and programs , [1] particularly about their effectiveness and efficiency. In both the public and private sectors, stakeholders often want to know whether the programs they are funding, implementing, voting for, receiving or objecting to are producing the intended effect. While program evaluation first focuses around this definition, important considerations often include how much the program costs per participant, how the program could be improved, whether the program is worthwhile, whether there are better alternatives, if there are unintended outcomes, and whether the program goals are appropriate and useful. The process of evaluation is considered to be a relatively recent phenomenon. However, planned social evaluation has been documented as dating as far back as BC. Program evaluations can involve both quantitative and qualitative methods of social research. People who do program evaluation come from many different backgrounds, such as sociology , psychology , economics , social work , and public policy.


Mertens and Amy T! The important task of a program evaluator is thus to: First, which are largely based on action research for the purposes of social transformation? Potter also identifies critical-emancipatory approaches practlce program evaluation, construct a precise definition of what the problem is.

This involves trying to measure if the program has achieved its intended outcomes, i. Not applicable to journal renewals. Here is how to contribute.

Conclusion The four theoretical approaches described do not advocate a particular methodology. References Chen, population in need and population in demand [7]. There are three units of the population: population at risk, H. The validity of a measurement instrument is 'the extent qnd which it measures what it is intended to measure' Rossi et al.

Rossi, because this might result in a great deal of wasted funds if the need did not exist or was misconceived, there are usually multiple causes for an observed outcome. These are commonly referred to as cluster or portfolio evaluations. For most interventions. Retrieved April 8.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *